Convener:
Tom Wright
Participants:
David Cottis, Alyn Gwyndaf, Alexis Terry, Hugh Hayes, Lucy Bradshaw, Victoria
Dyson and some bumblebees.
Summary of discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:
When I was an assistant director I accompanied an
actress playing a rape victim to meet a rape counselor. Once she’d answered our
questions she asked us, ‘How do you recreate this experience imaginatively
every night and not have it affect you?’ We were both stumped – we’d never
heard anyone ask that question before.
While it was agreed that acting could have lots of
positive effects, can make you ‘mentally well’ that there were, as there are in
any job, occupational risks. There were three main areas of interest: the life
of an actor, the training and actually making a show.
It was noted that our society’s attitude to mental
health is immensely unhelpful; don’t talk about it, because you won’t get
offered work, etc.
LIFE
OF AN ACTOR
Does the profession attract some people who are more
mentally vulnerable? It was suggested that a lack of childhood love might draw
some people to a profession that makes you the centre of attention. We don’t
know of any research into this.
Actors are often in a subservient position; waiting
for someone to offer them a job, and then when in work, aiming to please the
director. This can lead to a lack of agency, the feeling of having control or
influence in your life. A study showed that lower ranking civil service members
died younger and had more stress-related conditions than high ranking staff;
being low status is bad for your health.
We talked about the way that the belief of Talent Will
Out can leave you depressed when life doesn’t work out the way you wanted; it’s
your fault not bad luck (see Death of a Salesman.)
This lack of agency might also cause actors to take on
projects for which they are psychologically unsuitable (i.e. someone who has
experienced a trauma takes a role in which they will need to enact that
trauma), or to be reticent to make directors aware of any psychological
problems they are experiencing
Positive steps include the idea of life-long training,
taking responsibility for constantly attending classes and workshops. Also
taking a more lead role in creating your own work.
There is also a conflation of professional and
personal worth. ‘I didn’t get the role – I’m crap/worthless.’ Directors can
help with this by providing clear feedback, as to why they were unsuitable for
the role.
Another negative myth actors might buy into is the
‘Tortured Artists,’ – if I’m not suffering it’s not working. If we can
collectively challenge this idea, and be really clear that there’s nothing
wrong with leaving your character’s emotions behind at the end of a day and
having a healthy life outside rehearsals/performing, that might help.
TRAINING
Drama school encourages actors to dig deep, but
sometimes without offering proper support. On the other hand, one actor
reported feeling very supported when the training brought up difficult things
for her, and enabled her to work with and through them.
Training talks a lot about ‘Warm Up, ‘Entering Your
Character’, ‘Emotional Access’, but much less about ‘Cool Down,’ ‘Stepping Away
from Your Character’ and ‘Emotional Release/Resilience.
THE
PROCESS
It was noted that the physical risks of acting are
taken very seriously, warm ups, physios, knee pads. What psychological support
do people need to be offered?
Actors (and rehearsals) work in different ways. Actors
who develop a role from the inside out might be more emotionally vulnerable
than those who are interested only in the external and what the audience sees.
The process of working on a show in general has an
impact; ending a production can trigger a down, following the adrenalin high of
performance. It was suggested that this could be addressed by acknowledging
this collectively at the end of a run so that the actors don’t feel that they
are alone/abnormal for having these feelings.
Performing a show can cause a lot of bleed between the
character’s emotions and your own; this is not necessarily a bad thing – actors
who perform being in love, falling in love, for example. Sometimes the
expression/release of emotion can be cathartic/exhilarating. Problems occur
when traumatic emotions are carried off the stage. Actors can contribute this
by a gung-ho attitude to going deeper and deeper into emotions and carrying
them around, ‘It makes me a better artist.’
Current closing rituals are focused on
frivolity/alcohol consumption. If that works then great! Some suggested
different rituals, like a simple five-minute meditation on your own body and
the space around you, to ground you before leaving the theatre. Mark Rylance
jumps up and down saying his own name, to get himself back into his own body.
In rehearsals, some report distress when rehearsing a
scene and the day lefts with them stuck in the middle of a trauma.
In trauma therapy, there is the concept of
Post-Traumatic Distress being stuck imaginatively/in your memory in the moment
just before the trauma. Lots of therapies rehearse the traumatic moment, which
can just make things worse. Possibly rehearsals can do the same thing? However,
the latest idea in trauma work is that by playing through to the moment beyond,
taking the story of the trauma through to, if not, ‘They lived happily after,’
at least, ‘They lived and other stuff happened,’ it can help heal the trauma.
Similarly if a director takes responsibility for closing the work at the end of
the day, allowing a scene to run to it’s end, or leading a cool down, it can
help actors not to get ‘stuck’ in the traumatic moment of a scene.
We talked about stage fright and how this can lead to
actors getting completely blocked/drying. All of Stanislavski’s work deals with
his attempts to overcome this tendency in himself.
We talked about the director’s responsibility; that
many go ‘This is Not Therapy,’ despite leading exercises to bring up deeply
buried emotions in the actor. Part of creating a safe process might involve
enabling actors to come forward when they are struggling. One director was
quoted who sees his job as asking the actors each day, ‘How are you?’ so that
they have the space to feedback if difficulties are occurring.
Trusting that a director will support you no matter
what is apparently helpful. On the other hand directors need to resist the
arrogance of assuming they can act as therapists!
If an actor taps into something and loses control in a
rehearsal, it was suggested that acknowledging this and allowing that person to
go through it is better than going, ‘Right, tea break, let’s pretend this isn’t
happening,’ as this can stigmatize that actor’s emotions.
Further reading/research included Frank Block, a
choreographer who trained as an existential therapists and lecturers on
creating a safe space for performers, and Nicky Flax, a director who’s very
interested in these issues.
This is a vital conversation that needs to be continued - I have recently been one of the collaborators in a national survey of professional actors (Equity Australia). We found from the 798 respondents to the survey that 38% of them (male and female, trained and untrained, across film, TV and stage) had difficulties debriefing from roles, especially traumatic roles. I'm very happy to be part of continuing such conversations and I have my own program of workshops that I've started using with actors to help them. Contact me, if you're interested to learn more. Dr Mark Cariston Seton, mc.seton@bigpond.com
ReplyDelete