Convener:
Eve Leigh
Participants:
Dan Bye, Kieran Hurley, Valentina Zagaria, Pascal Porcheron, Nir Paldi, Mark?, about
a dozen others over the course of two-and-a-half hours (!).
Summary of
discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:
Sometimes, as in clowning or traditional British
comedy, stereotypes are useful and fun – it just depends on who’s being
stereotyped. It’s important for theatre practitioners to continually check
their assumptions about characters against stereotypes or traditional matrices
of power. We heard stories about successful pieces of political theatre – most
of them seemed to involve engaging directly with the landscapes or populations
that were both their subjects and audiences. This raised questions about
authenticity – if privileged people make theatre about marginalized people, are
they crowding out the possibility of marginalized people telling their own
stories? Are they likely to regurgitate clichés rather than producing
compelling original work? But on the other hand, if we’re all confined to
making work about our firsthand experience, isn’t that boring and limiting?
Doesn’t that negate the power of empathy in theatre? The conclusion we seemed
to come to was that making theatre outside one’s own experience requires
vigilant assumption-checking and dedicated research.
No comments:
Post a Comment