Convener:
Tom Wright
Participants:
Mhairi Grewlis (I’m sure I got that wrong – sorry!) Nicola Stanhope, Rose
Biggin, Eve Leigh, Sian Rees, David Cottis, Tom Brocklehurst and a hive worth
of bumblebees.
Summary of
discussion, conclusions and/or recommendations:
So, on Sat night I saw a 110min straight through show.
The performances were amazingly committed and the writing was lush and dense,
but five minutes in I knew that it would bleak; nothing good would happen to
these characters and there was no chink of hope. All that skill and effort was
aiming to make me depressed. I need no help to get depressed; I can do that
sitting in a dark room on my own for a bit. If I really need help I can turn on
the news for five minutes. What I need help with is generating hope, feeling
up-lifted and inspired. Yet this show had dozens of five star reviews and was
sold out.
Throwing it open the floor, I was persuaded to reveal
the show; Pitchfork Disney. I was roundly told that the script was brilliant
and hilarious. My bad! We drilled further in:
Mel Brooks: ‘Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy
is when you walk into an open sewer and die.’
Me: Comedy is when horrible things happen and you
laugh, but at the end everything is resolved. I like this. (Can, like musical,
be like a happy meal – sugary/fatty fun on the way in but lets you crash.)
Tragedy is when horrible things, but they are not
inevitable, you sit going ‘no, don’t do that!’ then you end up crying, and come
out purged. I like this too.
For both to be satisfying they have to have light and
dark. Also happy with comedy-tragic and tragic-comedy (funny and ends badly, or
sad but ends happy.)
But there’s a new thing were everything starts bleak,
no hope, then there’s a grim middle section before a despairing ending. Ugh.
Seems to be very popular with reviewers and audiences – feels very serious and
we like to talk about serious.
(Digression on academia – is it okay to talk about
emotional response in academia? Some different views on this.)
Site recommendation: Taste (haven’t found URL yet?)
which sorts reviews by feeling it engenders not genre or stars. Sounds great!
General feeling; I’m picking my tickets really poorly!
Everyone else seems to be seeing inspiring stuff from time to time.
Other ways at looking at the issue:
Cynicism vs. what? Idealism? Romanticism?
Or in fact, since drama reflects life which is hard,
but not unending horror, all drama should have light and shade. Unremittingly
bleak is therefore just bad, as would be unremittingly chirpy. Question of
quality not emotional choice.
Is it to do with process – might writers, on there
own, get more bleak than devisers bouncing off each other?
Ayckbourn, Chekhov, Beckett – funny but bleak as about
people stuck, unable to change. Do we laugh at them, feeling smug, because we
believe that we can change?
Inspiring shows – Big Society, Operation Wingfield,
Daniel Kitson.
Maybe one play doesn’t transform you, but like reading
a particular newspaper, the constant drip drip of a certain sort of story can
have a profound impact.
Key question for an artist: What do you want to
achieve?
Lower Class Social Bleakness as Social Tourism –
Middle classes get to be relieved that their life is not that bad.
It’s nice to have characters you can care about.
If
this world is meaningless maybe we should celebrate those who are making
meaning! Very liking this. Might make it into a t-shirt.
Closed with a promise that if TomWrightDirector.com
comes up with something which is just bleak you can punch him in the face.
Regretting that a bit now, as lots of people seemed
quite keen to hold me to it. Oh well. Promise is a promise. . .
Actions: If anyone knows the address of the emotion
review site, let me know. Also I want to know you’re stories about theatre
uplifting/inspiring you in a lasting way.
Are you thinking of http://www.tastetheatre.com? good luck - great post!
ReplyDelete