Convener: Mark
Participants:
Isabel
Summary of discussion, conclusions and/or
recommendations:
We were concerned that theatre was v
expensive. We noted that it could cost £66 to see Legally Blonde tonight.
We were concerned that the first people to
pay when prices are constrained/reduced tend to be the artists/workers. Cheap
tix mean more interns, reduced engagements, lower fees.
So we thought the schemes that subsidise
tix are vital, like those at the National and Young Vic. We also thought it was
important that this was extra money, rather than diverting funds from the
artist to the audience. BTW who pays for YV £10 tix? We also thought it good
that a proportion of tix are held for cheap seats.
We worried that people who could afford to
pay were also benefiting from these schemes. We did not go as far as means
testing the audience.
We discussed looking at how other
industries/countries do it. Are there lessons there? We did not know about
abroad, it transpired - does anyone else know of clever ways colleagues from
other countries do it?
Other industries included the airlines:-
Differential pricing (tix get more
expensive the later you book/the rarer they are)
Adding extras (Ryanair model) which we
already do with booking fees, restoration levies, and card charges (should we
charge for the toilets like we do for cloaks?)
We felt pursuing the capitalist model may
not be the answer for theatre. There must be models that better reflect our
place in society.
We noted that the people who set prices
tend not to have to pay them, either 'cos they get comps, or often don't go to
much. Radical idea - Theatre Managers should have to pay for their seats.
No comments:
Post a Comment